Gevo’s Departure: A Setback for South Dakota’s Economic Ambitions
South Dakota’s opportunity to become a significant player in the sustainable aviation fuel industry has hit a significant roadblock. Gevo, the biofuel giant, has confirmed it will no longer pursue its plans to establish a $1.46 billion jet fuel plant in Lake Preston. Instead, Gevo is redirecting its ambitions to Richardton, North Dakota, a decision rooted in South Dakota’s political and industrial climate.
Two years prior, Gevo had announced its intention to develop a state-of-the-art jet fuel facility in South Dakota. Yet this proposal hinged on the approval of the Summit Carbon Solutions CO2 pipeline. The state’s refusal to approve the pipeline and its subsequent ban on eminent domain for CO2 projects prompted Gevo to reconsider its strategy.
“South Dakota is a very difficult place to do business,” Gevo’s CEO, Pat Gruber, stated in a candid interview. “Everything is oppositional. North Dakota is a breath of fresh air.” Gruber’s sentiments reflect a growing discontent with South Dakota’s regulatory hurdles, which he claims are inhibiting economic growth.
The shift from South Dakota has tangible economic implications. Gevo had projected the Lake Preston venture would inject approximately $900,000 in annual property taxes into the local economy and create 90 full-time jobs. The annual economic impact was estimated at $100 million, a boon South Dakota will miss out on.
The decision by the South Dakota government, marked by a general opposition to eminent domain for CO2 pipelines and internal political discord, particularly within the Republican Party, significantly influenced Gevo’s relocation. Governor Kristi Noem, once a supporter of Gevo’s project, found herself embroiled in a party tumult that prioritized opposing interests over business incentives.
South Dakota’s internal political dynamics have seen a shift in recent years. The 2024 Republican primary upheaval, where mainstream candidates were ousted by more ideologically opposed factions, distanced Noem’s administration from aligning with corporate enterprises like Gevo. This political climate has been highlighted as a factor in the company’s decision to relocate.
Gruber’s remarks outline a stark contrast between the business environments of the two Dakota states. “North Dakota has a great business environment. It wants to grow industry and agriculture,” Gruber remarked. In Richardton, Gevo plans to expand the Red Trail Energy plant, the first ethanol facility in the United States to capture and store CO2. The strategic location near the Bakken Formation offers Gevo a unique opportunity to sell captured carbon to the oil industry for enhanced recovery, presenting an added business incentive.
This move symbolizes a significant loss for South Dakota, not only in terms of immediate economic benefits but in positioning itself as a hub for renewable energy innovation. While local farmers and citizens stand to lose economically, this decision also impacts South Dakota’s burgeoning clean energy sector ethos.
The failure to capitalize on this development opportunity underscores broader issues within the state’s political and business framework. As Gruber pointed out, “It’s anti-development, as if they want to go backward in time.” These sentiments highlight a pivotal moment for South Dakota policymakers, as residents increasingly call for a focus on sustainable growth and innovation-friendly policies.
The shift of Gevo’s investment highlights the urgent need for South Dakota to reassess its business strategies and regulatory frameworks. This decision represents a roadmap for the future, illustrating how interconnected business environment, political harmony, and infrastructural support are in attracting and retaining high-value industries.
As the conversation around sustainable energy continues to evolve, South Dakota faces a critical juncture. Adjusting its approach could unlock significant opportunities, not only in job creation and economic upliftment but also in shaping the state’s long-term energy policy trajectory. Learning from North Dakota’s facilitative stance might offer valuable lessons for fostering a more vibrant and inclusive business ecosystem.
For further inquiries, please contact via email.